US experts think Japanese officials are underestimating radiation risks

An excellent article in the New York Times today about the perceived radiation risks in Fukushima. US experts believe that those risks are quite a bit higher than estimated in Japan.

As shown in the New York Times article today: Fukushima location and evacuation zone

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), so states the article, gives a significantly bleaker appraisal of the threat posed by Fukushima, saying that the damage at one of the reactors was much more serious than acknowledged in Japan. Americans are advised to evacuate from an area much larger than the safety zone established by the Japanese.

Japan started its fifth day in the fight for control of the reactors in Fukushima after their cooling systems were knocked out by the earthquake and tsunami. I’ve been impressed by the efforts of the Japanese, although Japanese officials are criticized for not seeking outside support early enough and supplying insufficient information about the situation. The new statement by the NRC adds a bit more fuel to this fire.

 

 

One response to “US experts think Japanese officials are underestimating radiation risks

  1. I have proof that we don’t need Nuclear Energy in order to save the planet, on my website. Please check it out.

    Also if we made every home and building independently powered by Solar, wind, and Hydrogen fuel cells, we wouldn’t need grids or power plants of any kind; coal, natural gas, nuclear, or need to dam rivers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s